These are like vaults in which you store your own data and give companies permission to access some of that data (source: The New York USA Phone Number List Times ). In the Netherlands there are also well-known champions of a freer internet, such as Marleen Stikker (director of Waag and author of the book The Internet is broken ) and José van USA Phone Number List Dijck (professor at Utrecht University). Van Dijck tells De Groene Amsterdammer that USA Phone Number List she now sees the problem of the power of social networks in the war between Russia and Ukraine: These companies are given the task of moderating an information war.
Do we allow Russia Today to USA Phone Number List spread disinformation, do we keep certain sites online? Those are gigantic responsibilities, which in the past were borne by states and democracies. Is Web3 the Answer? Web3 USA Phone Number List would be the solution to the current problems. The biggest change in Web3 is the USA Phone Number List architecture (it runs on blockchains), writes Jan Scheele on Frankwatching . “From USA Phone Number List a handful of central parties that dominate to a decentralized environment where everyone regains control over their own data and is rewarded fairly for their contribution to the web.” But there is criticism of Web3.
Web 2.0 was also supposed to USA Phone Number List become a lot more democratic, but has not (or barely) lived up to that. Why would that work with Web3? Jack Dorsey tweets skeptically that the people trying to market Web3 were also USA Phone Number List getting filthy rich from Web 2.0. Accept cookies Ernst-Jan Pfauth, meanwhile, USA Phone Number List has doubts in the NRC : “Moreover, there are many libertarians among them, who hope that Web3 will decentralize everything so that we no longer need governments. Not to mention the environmental impact of some blockchains.” José van Dijck states in De Greene Amsterdam that Web3 gets stuck ideologically on.